Alongside unsupported nano palladium and the Pd/MWCNT composite, two supported grades are available for evaluation: Pd/CeO₂/C and Pd/RuO₂/C. This page states plainly what we can say about them today and what we are still waiting on from the manufacturer, because an evaluation started on vague data wastes your time first.
A support is not inert packaging. It disperses the active metal so more of it is exposed, it stabilises particles against sintering, and in the case of a reducible oxide such as ceria it participates — supplying and accepting oxygen at the metal-support interface. That is why Pd on ceria behaves differently from Pd on plain carbon at the same loading, and why the support has to be part of your specification rather than an afterthought.
| Pd/CeO₂/C | Palladium on a ceria–carbon support. Evaluation samples available. |
|---|---|
| Pd/RuO₂/C | Palladium on a ruthenium-oxide–carbon support. Evaluation samples available. |
| Related unsupported grades | Nano RuO₂·2H₂O 99.5% · nano palladium powder · Pd/MWCNT (5/95) |
We do not have the confirmed figure for these two supported grades yet and we will not estimate it. Tell us the loading your evaluation needs and we will ask the manufacturer directly.
Ceria is a reducible oxide that stores and releases oxygen at the metal-support interface, which changes behaviour in oxidation chemistry compared with an inert carbon support. Whether that helps depends entirely on your reaction.
Ruthenium oxide is an oxygen-evolution material, so the combination is of interest electrochemically, but we will not claim an electrode performance we have not been given data for. For OER as a raw material, our nano RuO2 powder is the established route.
Yes. Evaluation samples of both are available while the full datasheets are being prepared.
Tell us your application — a real person replies within 1–2 business days.