The transparent nano zinc oxide dispersion we supply to cosmetic formulators has a second life outside cosmetics. The property that makes it useful there — blocking ultraviolet without whitening the product — is exactly what a transparent protective coating or film needs, and the same material also carries antistatic and infrared-absorbing behaviour.
| Composition | ZnO, water, dispersing aid — pale yellow transparent liquid |
|---|---|
| Solid content | 5% |
| UV attenuation | Reflects and blocks 290–380 nm, covering UVB and UVA |
| Other properties | Antistatic · infrared absorption |
| Morphology / size | Flake · average 300 nm · BET 20 m²/g |
| pH / SG | 6–8 · 1.2 ± 0.05 g/cm³ |
| Dosage / packaging | 1–2% · RoHS · 20 kg drum |
That last case is the useful contrast to draw. If your part can be black, a graphene dispersion gives a far stronger antistatic effect. If it must stay clear, zinc oxide is the route that does not cost you the appearance. Two different materials, chosen by whether transparency is negotiable.
Yes, the same dispersion, TL-050901. In cosmetics it is a regulated UV filter and we make no SPF claim; in an industrial coating the regulatory position is entirely different. Tell us the application so we route the documentation correctly.
It is specified as a transparent dispersion with a flake morphology, which is what allows that. Final clarity still depends on your loading and dispersion, so trial it against your haze target.
Graphene is far more effective and is black. Zinc oxide is weaker and stays clear. The decision is whether transparency is negotiable.
It is a real consideration with zinc oxide in organic systems. Raise it in your evaluation, and choose your binder accordingly.
Tell us your application — a real person replies within 1–2 business days.